My thinking was challenged today as I heard about the discovery of a new book of the Bible called, "The gospel according to Judas."
We all know the story about Judas. He betrayed Jesus, right? Maybe not. The newly discovered Book of Judas suggests that Judas was actually the favorite disciple...and the only one Jesus could entrust with his command to hand him over to the Romans.
Interesting perspective.
Of course, the thought that there might be a Gospel according to Judas challenges what we've always been taught to believe...that the Bible is a set of 66 books...and only those books. There have, however, been other books found--the gospel of Mary...the gospel of Thomas--each with their own interesting perspectives.
In fact, I remember hearing about the release of the Dead Sea Scrolls while I was in college. My questioning mind wondered who narrowed the documents down to 66 books and who decided which of those documents would and wouldn't be included.
It was at that point I realized the books of the Bible, in fact, were chosen by men...fallible humans. Over the years, the most troubling part of that, to me, is not that the books were chosen by man. (That makes sense.) What has come to bother me most is that most people don't seem to think (or maybe even care) that the books in our current Bible were chosen by men during a certain time period in our history. We don't think about the fact that who chose them and when they chose them could definitely have affected which ones they chose.
For instance...I was always taught to follow the New Testament, even though the New Testament encourages slaves to remain slaves...that it's part of God's plan. The New Testament also talks about women covering their head in public.
We know that is not the world we live in now. The Bible is contextual. It was written in a time when slavery was taken for granted and women covered their heads. We have no problem explaining why we do not abide by those commands today. So, like it or not, we filter out and choose which parts we want to follow.
I'm afraid, as Christians, we sometimes blindly accept what we've been taught and we listen to preachers and spiritual leaders without question. The problem isn't that we're blindly trusting God...it's that we're trusting man. We even let man tell us which portions of the Bible are important. What would happen if we read and used all of the scriptures? What would we find is important?
Then, what if we looked into all of the documents that have been left out? What would we find?? Would the message change?
Who knows...once we read ALL of the information, we might have a different outlook on our Christian beliefs.
For more information on Pagels' and King's book about "Reading Judas," click here.
6 comments:
This reminds me of my first English class in college which was basically all about religion and how we are closed minded to different religions. I guess it could be true to say we are closed minded b/c of the things that we have always known to be true(thought to be truth). Stepping outside of the box could mean betraying our religion. This is most definitely a true blog. When preachers preach they always say The Bible says not the Bible where a group of humans decided what should be put in and what should be left out. Great blog!!!
~*Jess*~
Thanks for pointing this out!! Who would know there were more books to the Bible?? I married a man from Russia - he enlightened me on so many of these things. In our world, we've come to view these 66 books as "the inspired word of God." Man, are we off base! Heaven help you if you try to share this with others though - my husband once did the scripture reading from Tobit. He was told that wasn't inspired and he wasn't to read it anymore. HUH?
I recommend the book The Canon of Scripture by Frederick Bruce for more study regarding the how, when and who decided (and what was not included) for further study of this topic if you are interested. Look it up on Amazon to find out more.
The Bible I'm currently using it a St. Joseph version - purchased from a Catholic bookstore. Only place I could find it.
Thanks Belinda and Becky. Interesting information. The Cannon of Scripture and the St. Joseph's Bible both sound very interesting. I use the Message just because it is so much more readable and down-to-earth practical. I have, however, heard critics about Eugene Peterson's credentials. ...which still makes me go "hmmm" when I wonder how "King James" got to be as revered as he was/is on the topic.
me too! but - at least where I live in North Alabama - you need to have your scripture approved before reading in public.
Post a Comment